The study of anatomy of main pancreatic duct and its variations.
Year : 2019 | Volume : 7 | Issue : 2 Page : 31-37
Author: - Dr Malathi K1, Dr Kishan Reddy C2
1Associate professor, 2Professor & HOD, Department of Anatomy, , Prathima Institute of Medical Sciences,
Nagunoor, Karimnagar, Telangana, India..
*Address for correspondence:: Dr K Malathi, Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Prathima Institute of Medical
Sciences, Nagunoor , Karimnagar, Telangana, India.
E mail ID: - kondamalathi@gmail.com
Abstract
Introduction: The duct system of pancreas consists of
two large ducts – Main pancreatic duct and Accessory
pancreatic duct. Both these ducts drain the entire exocrine
part of pancreas. Main pancreatic duct is always present while
accessory pancreatic duct may be absent in 30% cases. The
study of duct system of pancreas has wide application in
pancreatitis, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticogram,
pancreatic calculi, carcinoma of pancreas and
even in obstructive jaundice caused by gall stone disease and
also in gall bladder carcinoma.
Materials & Methods: The present study was done in
50 adult formalin fixed pancreatic specimens removed during
posterior abdominal wall dissection.
Statistical analysis: Done using Mean, Standard
deviation, Percentage
Results: The study showed that the mean length and
standard deviation of the main pancreatic duct was 18.4 ± 2.43
cm and the mean width and standard deviation of the duct
was 2.7 ± 0.8 mm, 2.3 ± 0.5 mm 2.1 ± 0.2 mm respectively in
the head, body and the tail. The main pancreatic duct coursed
from tail to its opening into the duodenum through five various
types Descending (46%), Vertical (4%), Loop(2%) , Sigmoid(30%)
and Horizontal(18%). The main pancreatic duct opened into
the major duodenal papillae in 72% specimens.
Conclusion: The mean length of the main pancreatic
duct varies from 13.4 to 26.cm, while the width of the duct
gradually increases from tail to head. Descending type was most
common while loop type was least common type of the main
pancreatic duct course. The main drainage route of the
pancreas was through major duodenal papilla.
Keywords: Main pancreatic duct, Length, Width, Type,
Drainage route
INTRODUCTION
Pancreas is a mixed exocrine and endocrine gland. The
exocrine part of the gland is drained by main and accessory pancreatic ducts. The main pancreatic duct begins in the tail
of the pancreas by union of interlobular ducts, courses through
the body and neck where it curves downwards, backwards and
opens into the duodenum through major duodenal papilla
after the formation of hepato-pancreatic ampulla by uniting
with common bile duct.
The distal part of the main pancreatic duct is
formed from the embryonic dorsal pancreatic duct while the
proximal part of the duct is formed from the embryonic ventral
pancreatic duct and also from the communication formed
between the ventral and dorsal pancreatic ducts during the
process of development. Thus the main pancreatic duct
undergoes variations in size, course and its opening into the
duodenal papillae. The non-union of the embryological ducts
results in the persistence of the dorsal and ventral ducts which
is called pancreas divisum / embryonic type of duct system.
The knowledge of these variations in the duct
system of pancreas is very important clinically and surgically.
Ductal length is the main factor influencing the choice of the
surgical procedures like pancreatico-jujunostomy or pancreatic
resection and its study helps in differentiating the congenital
anomalies like partial agenesis of pancreas. The study of width
has clinical significance in pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer/
malignancy. The knowledge of course and opening of the main
pancreatic duct is essential in the management of the acute
or chronic pancreatitis, in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography
and also in cholelithiasis and gall bladder
carcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study was done in 50 adult formalin fixed specimens
of pancreas and duodenum en-bloc obtained during dissection
of posterior abdominal wall. The study was made regardless
of age and sex.
The duct system was approached from the posterior
surface of the pancreas by piecemeal dissection of the
substance of the gland. The main pancreatic duct was identified
first in the body of the pancreas and later it was traced to both
ends i.e., tail and duodenal wall. The common bile duct and
the hepato-pancreatic ampulla were exposed. The length of the ducts was measured using a thread and a manual vernier
calipers.
The duodenum was opened on the right side and the
estimated entrance point for the pancreatic duct and common
bile duct into the duodenal lumen was made.
The entire duct system was colored using different
paints and photographs of the patterns were taken.
RESULTS
The main pancreatic duct was measured from its
formation by the union of the interlobular ducts in the tail of
pancreas to its termination either by uniting with common bile
duct or its direct opening into the duodenum. Table no-1 shows
the various measurements of the main pancreatic duct.
Table no-1
Mean length and standard deviation of the main pancreatic
duct
CONCLUSION:
The mean length of the main pancreatic duct varies
from 13.4 to 26.cm.
The mean width of the duct gradually increases from
tail to head with the mean width being 1.3mm, 2.3mm and
2.7mm respectively in the tail, body and head of pancreas.
The type/course of the main pancreatic duct depends
on the method of development of the communication between
main and accessory pancreatic ducts. Descending type was the
most common while loop type was the least common type.
The prevalence of vertical and sigmoid course was markedly
different which may be because of ethnicity. Horizontal type
was the persistent embryonic dorsal pancreatic duct.
The main drainage route of the pancreas is through
major duodenal papilla. The opening of main pancreatic duct
into minor duodenal papilla may be due to non union of
pancreatic ducts, after fusion of dorsal and ventral pancreas
during development. This type of drainage pattern here was
associated with development of communication between the
main and the accessory pancreatic duct to reduce load on the
minor papilla while diverting some of its contents into
duodenum through major papilla; or it was not involved in
the formation of hepato-pancreatic ampulla thus preventing
the load of common bile duct on the smaller minor papilla.
REFERENCES:
1. S Ara, Shahriah S, Begum S. The length of main pancreatic
duct in Bangladeshi cadaver at different age groups.
Mymensingh Med J. 2011 Apr;20(2):298-30.
2. Kang JK, Chung JB, Moon YM, Choi HJ. The normal
endoscopic pancreatogram in Koreans. Korean Journal of
Internal Medicine. (1989).
3. Kochhar. Narayanan govindraj, shabna. C. Variations in
the duct system of pancreas: A cadaveric study. Int j anat
res 2017;5(3.1):4136-4143. Doi: 10.16965/ijar.2017.269.
4. Sahni D, Jit I, Harjeet. Gross anatomy of the pancreatic
ducts in north Indians . Trop Gastroenterol. 2001 Oct-
Dec;22 (4):197-201.
5. Tehreem Fatima. Anatomical Variants of Pancreatic Duct
System In Human Cadavers, jfjmc, vol.4, jul – sept 2010.
6. Wilasrusmee.C, Pongchairerks P. Pancreaticobiliary ductal
anatomy in Thai people. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.
1999;6(1):79-85.
7. Lucas .N. Pina, Does the Accessory Pancreatic Duct have
any Protective Role in Acute Biliary Pancreatitis?
Anatomical Findings from Cadaver Dissections , MOJ Anat
& Physiol 2016, 2(7): 00071.
8. Narayanan Govindraj, Shabna.C 2. Variations in the duct
system of pancreas: a cadaveric study International
Journal of Anatomy and Research, Int J Anat Res 2017,
Vol 5(3.1):4136-43. ISSN 2321-4287.
9. Kasugai T, Kuno N, Nobayashi S. Endoscopic
pancreatocholangiography. I. The normal endoscopic
pancreatocholangiogram. Gastroenterology 63:217. 1972;
10. Kreel L, Sandin B, Slavin G. Pancreatic morphology. A
combined radiological and pathological study. Clin Radiol
24:154. 1973;
11. Gonoi. Akai H, Hagiwara K, Akahane M, Hayashi N, et al.
(2011) Pancreas divisum as a predisposing factor for
chronic and recurrent idiopathic pancreatitis: initial in vivo
survey. Gut 60: 1103–1108.W.
12. Zehra Hilal Adebilli, Anatomic variations of the pancreatic
duct and their relevance with the Cambridge classification
system: MRCP findings of 1158 consecutive patients .
Radiol Oncol 2016; 50(4): 370-377.
13. Shu.J, Zhang XM, Zhao JN, Zeng NL Normal pancreatic
duct: Evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography
.Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology 2006;
22(4):584-7 .
14. Ladas SD. Tassios PS, Giorgiotis K, Rokkas T, Theodosiou P,
Raptis SA Pancreatic duct width: its significance as a
diagnostic criterion for pancreatic disease.
Hepatogastroenterology. 1993 Feb;40(1):52-5.
15. Mark D Edge. Edge MD, Hoteit M, Patel AP, Wang X,
Baumgarten DA, Cai Q. Clinical significance of main
pancreatic duct dilation on computed tomography: Single
and double duct dilation. World Journal of
Gastroenterology : WJG. 2007;1 3(11):1701-1705.
doi:10.3748/wjg.v13.i11.1701.
16. S Anand Rani. ,Sumathi Latha,Patency of accessory
pancreatic duct and its relation with duodenal inter
papillary distance, S. Indian J Gastroenterol (2012) 31: 24.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-011-0150.
17. Varley PF, Rohrmann CA Jr, Silvis SE, Vennes JA .The normal
endoscopic pancreatogram. Radiology. 1976 Feb;118
(2):295-300.
18. Hadid A. Pancreatic duct diameter: sonographic
measurement in normal subjects. J Clin Ultrasound. 1983
Jan;11(1):17-22
19. Karak PK, Vashisht S, Tandon RK, Berry MNormal
endoscopic pancreatogram in an Indian referral hospital.
Indian J Med Res. 1991 Dec;94:426-9.
20. Manfredi. Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopan
creatography (MRCP): Biliary and Pancreatic Ducts.
Riccardo Manfredi, Roberto Pozzi Mucelli.2013.Pg 20-30
21. Ann.s.fulcher. Turner MA, Capps GW, Zfass AM, Baker KM,
Half-Fourier RARE MRCP in 300 subjects. Radiology 1998;
207: 21-32.
22. Dahnert. Oxford handbook of Medical Imaging, 7th
Edition, Michael J Darby, Dominic A Barron, Rachel E
Hyland, 2012, Pg:341-357.
How to cite this article : Malathi K , Kishan Reddy C. The
study of anatomy of main pancreatic duct and its variations.
Perspectives in Medical Research 2019; 7(2):31-37
Sources of Support: Nil,Conflict of interest:None declared