Perspectives in Medical Research

Volume: 11 Issue: 3

  • Open Access
  • Original Article

Assessment of awareness and attitude o f medical students about physicians’ participation in capital punishments in India — a cross-sectional study

MBBS, ESIC Medical College & PGIMSR, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, ESIC Medical College & PGIMSR, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
*Corresponding Author: Vaishnavi R, MBBS, ESIC Medical College & PGIMSR, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
E-MAIL: [email protected]

Year: 2023, Page: 72-77, Doi: https://doi.org/10.47799/pimr.1103.14

Received: Aug. 31, 2023 Accepted: Dec. 20, 2023 Published: Dec. 20, 2023

Abstract

Introduction: In the context of capital punishment in India, the involvement of physicians raises ethical concerns, given the fundamental principle of 'do no harm.' This study aims to evaluate the awareness and attitudes of undergraduate medical students in a Chennai-based medical college regarding physicians' participation in capital punishment.
Methods: A survey employing Google Forms was conducted among 154 randomly selected medical students. The questionnaire, validated for content, comprised 13 statements assessing awareness and attitudes toward physicians' involvement in capital punishment. Descriptive analysis was applied to interpret the collected data.
Results: The study revealed a notable lack of awareness among medical students concerning physicians' roles in capital punishment in India. Merely 19.3% of participants were knowledgeable about the various responsibilities physicians undertake in judicial hanging, including certifying the prisoner's fitness for hanging, confirming the prisoner's death post-hanging, and ensuring humane conditions for the execution. Despite limited awareness, the predominant attitude among participants was one of disapproval towards physicians' participation in capital punishment.
Conclusion: This study underscores the inadequate awareness among medical students regarding physicians' involvement in capital punishment. Despite this limited awareness, the prevailing attitude among participants leans towards the disapproval of physicians participating in such practices.

Keywords: KAP Survey, Capital Punishment, India, Perception, Physician Awareness

References

  1. Groner, Jonathan I . 2018. The hippocratic paradox: A surgeon’s journey to death row and back. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 85(4):679–683.

  2. Jesani, Amar . 2004. Medicalisation of ‘legal’killing: doctors’ participation in the death penalty. Indian J Med Ethics 1:104–5.

  3. Law Commission of India 2003. 187th Report on mode of execution of death sentence and incidental mattershttps://cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s3ca0daec69b5adc880fb464895726dbdf/uploads/2022/08/2022081073.pdf

  4. Waisel, D . 2007. Physician participation in capital punishment. InMayo Clinic Proceedings 82(9):1073–1080.

  5. Association, World Medical . 2018. WMA Resolution to Reaffirm the WMA's Prohibition of Physician Participation in Capital Punishment. Reykjavik

  6. Gadde, P & Akkaloori, A . 2018. The revised Declaration of Geneva, 2017, and India's contradictory legal provisions. Indian J Med Ethics .

  7. Vora, P . 2017. Indian Medical Association asks that doctors be excused from participating in execution of convicts. Scroll.in. https://scroll.in/pulse/855310/indian-medical-association-asks-that-doctors-be-excused-from-participating-in-execution-of-convicts#:

  8. Lal, S & Sehgal, P . 2022. Integration of Attitude, Ethics, and Communication Competencies into Competency-based UG Curriculum. Indian J Community Med 47(1):4–7.

  9. Prabhu, G . 2019. The disappearing act: Humanities in the medical curriculum in India. Indian J Med Ethics 4(3):194–197.

  10. 2018. Module 4.8: Dealing with death. In: Attitude, Ethics and Communication (AETCOM) Competencies for the Indian Medical Graduate. (pp. 70-72) New Delhi: Medical Council of India

  11. Sawicki, K S . Health-Care Professionals and Lethal Injection: An Ethical Inquiry. J Med Philos 47(1):18–31.

  12. Alper, T . 2009. The Truth about Physician Participation in Lethal Injection Executions. C L Rev 88:11.

  13. Farber, N J, Aboff, B M, Weiner, J, Davis, E B, Boyer, E G & Ubel, P A . 2001. Physicians’ willingness to participate in the process of lethal injection for capital punishment. Annals of Internal Medicine 135(10):884–892.

  14. Wirt, D P, Bailey, W C, Bowers, W J, Farber, N J, Davis, E B & Weiner, J . 2001. Physicians’ attitudes about involvement in lethal injection for capital punishment [4] (multiple letters) Arch Intern Med 161(10):1353–1357.

  15. Konecny, B . 2016. A Lack of Transparency: The Restoring Proper Justice Act as a New Mourning Veil of Execution Procedures. N C Cent Univ Sci Intellect Property Law Rev 9(1).

  16. American Psychological Association 2001. The Death Penalty in the United Stateshttps://www.apa.org/about/policy/death-penalty (accessed 2023-12-05)

Cite this article

Vaishnavi R , Kala M. Assessment of awareness and attitude of medical students about physicians’ participation in capital punishments in India — a cross-sectional study. Perspectives in Medical Research. 2023;13(3):72-77 DOI: 10.47799/pimr.1103.14

Views
292
Downloads
71
Citations