Perspectives in Medical Research

Volume: 11 Issue: 2

  • Open Access
  • Original Article

Radiological study of foramen arcuale: implications for screw insertion via posterior arch for fixation of C1 vertebrae in atlantoaxial instability using plain radiograph

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Baramati
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Dr S.S. Tantia Medical College, Hospital and Research Center, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan
*Corresponding Author: Wasim Hiroli, Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Baramati
E-MAIL: [email protected]

Year: 2023, Page: 61-66, Doi: https://doi.org/10.47799/pimr.1102.12

Received: July 20, 2023 Accepted: Aug. 16, 2023 Published: Aug. 16, 2023

Abstract

Introduction: Foramen arcuale is an osseous structure forming a bridge from the superior articular process of the atlas that completely or partially encircles the vertebral artery. We retrospectively reviewed plain cervical radiographs as suggested by neurosurgeons, neurologists and orthopaedic surgeons for evaluation of cervical spine problems. When foramen arcuale is present, it creates a false impression of a broad posterior arch and can pose a risk during neurosurgery. The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of foramen arcuale in the Jalgaon & Baramati population.
Materials and Methods: 1255 lateral cervical spine radiographs were obtained from the radiology department, GMC, Jalgaon & GMC Baramati. The patient of which 655 (59.04%) were males and 600(31.42%) were females. Cases were classified as an incomplete and complete bony ridge.
Results: Overall prevalence of Foramen arcuale was 8.36%, with complete lesions in 3.50% and incomplete lesions in 4.86%. We noted an increasing percentage of patients with Foramen arcuale from the younger to the adolescent age group, with significantly greater prevalence in patients aged 15-30 years compared with the younger groups. Lesions were more common in males (59.04%) compared with females (31.42%), but no statistically significant difference between genders was detected for complete as well as incomplete foramen arcuale (p=0.95).
Conclusion: The foramen arcuale is a relatively common osseous structural variant therefore; surgeons should consider the risk of the presence of an FA prior to procedures on the atlas in each patient. So we suggest the identification of this variant by preoperative lateral radiograph as a starting point for C1 lateral mass for screw fixation via the posterior arch for atlantoaxial instability. If foramen arcuale is suspected or confirmed on a radiograph, 3D CT scanning should be considered for variations in size and shape of foramen arcuale and the possibility of injury to the vertebral artery.

Keywords: Foramen arcuale (FA), Vertebral artery, Atlas, Atlantoaxial instability, Lateral cervical radiograph, Lateral mass screw

References

  1. Wysocki, J, Bubrowski, M, Reymond, J & Kwiatkowski, J . 2003. Anatomical variants of the cervical vertebrae and the first thoracic vertebra in man. Folia Morphol 62:357–363.

  2. Ghanayem, A J & Paxinos, O . 2005. Functional anatomy of joints, ligaments and disc. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 46–54.

  3. Tubbs, R S, Johnson, P C, Shoja, M M, Loukas, M & Oakes, W J . 2007. Foramen arcuale: anatomical study and review of the literature. J Neurosurg Spine 6:31–34.

  4. Young, J P, Young, P H, Ackermann, M J, Anderson, P A & Riew, K D . 2005. The foramen arcuale: implications for screw insertion into the first cervical lateral mass. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2495–2498.

  5. Yochum, T R & Rowe, L J . 2005. Essential of Radiology (3). (pp. 269-270) Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins

  6. Minor, Le, Trost, J M & O . 2004. Bony particles of the atlas (C1) over the groove for the vertebral artery in humans and primates:polymorphism and evolutionary trends. Am J PhysAnthropol 125(1):16–29.

  7. Crowe, H S . 1986. The foramen arcuale of the atlas vertebra and its significance. Upper CervMonogr 4(1):1–5.

  8. Mitchell, J . 1998. The prevalence and dimensions of the retroarticular canal of the atlas vertebra. Acta Anat 163:113–120.

  9. Krishnamurthy, A, Nayak, S R & Khan, S . 2007. Arcuate foramen of atlas: prevalence, phylogenetic and clinical significance. Rom J MorpholEmbryol 48:263–266.

  10. Unur, E, Erdoǧan, N & Üļger, H . 2004. Radiographic prevalence of complete arcuate foramen in Turkish population. Erciyes Tıp Derg 26:50–54.

  11. Yamaguchi, S, Eguchi, K & Kiura, Y . 2008. Posterolateral protrusion of the vertebral artery over the posterior arch of the atlas: quantitative anatomical study using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography. J Neurosurg 9:167–174.

  12. Munjal, S, Chauha, P & Ali, S . 2013. Prevalence of foramen arcuale of atlas: a radiological and cadaveric study in hilly regions of Uttarakhand. Natl J Med Dent 1:28–33.

  13. Sabir, H, Kumbhare, S & Rout, P . 2014. Evaluation of foramen arcuale on digital lateral cephalograms and cone beam computed tomography in patients with migraine and healthy individuals: a comparative study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radio 118(3):348–354.

  14. Lambarty, Bgh & Zivanovic, S . 1973. The retroarticular vertebral artery ring of the atlas and its significance. ActaAnatomica 85:113–122.

  15. Pękala, P A, Henry, B M & Pękala, J R . 2017. Prevalence of foramen arcuale and its clinical significance: a meta-analysis of 55,985 subjects. J Neurosurg Spine 27:276–290.

  16. Christensen, D M, Eastlack, R K & Lynch, J J . 2007. C1 anatomy and dimensions relative to lateral mass screw placement. Spine 32:844–848.

  17. Cakmak, O, Gurdal, E & Ekinci, G . 2005. Arcuate foramen and its clinical significance. Saudi Med J 26:1409–1413.

  18. Chitroda, P K, Katti, G & Baba, I A . 2013. Foramen arcuale on the posterior arch of atlas, prevalence analysis in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients of Gulbarga population. J ClinDiagn 7:3044–3047.

  19. Kendrick, G S & Biggs, N L . 1963. Prevalence of the foramen arcuale of the first cervical vertebra between ages six to seventeen. Anat Rec 145:449–451.

  20. Pyo, J & Lowman, R M . 1959. The foramen arcuale of the first cervical vertebra. Radiology 72(6):850–854.

  21. Dugdale, L M . 1981. The ponticulus posterior of the atlas. AustralaRadiol 25:237–238.

  22. Cederberg, R A, Benson, B W & Nunn, M . 2000. Arcuate foramen: prevalence by age, gender and degree of calcification. ClinOrthod Res 3:162–167.

  23. Sharma, V, Chaudhary, D & Mitra, R . 2010. Prevalence of foramen arcuale in Indian orthodontic patients. DentomaxillofacRadiol 39:277–83.

  24. Schilling, J, Schilling, A & Goldames, I S . 2010. Foramen arcuale on the posterior arch of the atlas, prevalence analysis in asymptomatic patients. Int J Morphol 28:317–339.

  25. Taitz, C & Nathan, H . 1986. Some observations on the posterior and lateral bridge of the atlas. ActaAnat (Basel) 127:212–229.

  26. Hasan, M, Shukla, S, Siddiqui, M S & Singh, D . 2001. Posterolateral tunnels and ponticuli in human atlas vertebrae. J Anat 199:339–382.

Cite this article

Hiroli W, Gadade V. Radiological study of foramen arcuale: implications for screw insertion via posterior arch for fixation of C1 vertebrae in atlantoaxial instability using plain radiograph. Perspectives in Medical Research. 2023;11(2):61-66 DOI: 10.47799/pimr.1102.12

Views
174
Downloads
68
Citations