Perspectives in Medical Research

Volume: 8 Issue: 1

  • Open Access
  • Original Article

A Study on the outcome of surgical management of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures in the geriatric population by various modalities

V Ramreddy1, Mohd Inayatulla Khan2

1 Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Prathima Institute of Medical Sciences, Naganur, Karimnagar, Telangana State.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences [RIMS], Adilabad. Telangana State.
Address for communication :
Dr. V Ramreddy. Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Prathima Institute of Medical Sciences, Naganur, Karimnagar, Telangana State.
Email: [email protected]
Dr. Mohd Inayatulla Khan, H.No. 5-3-5/8, Kubra Apartments, Flat No. 304, 2nd floor, Doctors Street, Karimnagar-505001. Telangana State.
Email: [email protected] Mobile:09948959937

Year: 2020, Page: 43-47,

Abstract

Background: Unstable hip fractures in elderly patients a unique challenge for orthopedic surgeons. Most of the cases are to be managed by surgical intervention. The problems of old age include the presence of osteoporosis, pre-existing arthritis, the overall health of the patient. We in the present study tried to evaluate the functional outcome of surgical management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures by various methods and study the effectiveness and complications of the operative management of unstable fractures.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out in the Department of Orthopedics, Prathima Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagunur, Karimnagar. All patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures with age > 65 years who are treated by the surgical intervention were included in the study. All the patients were operated in Spinal anesthesia and The standard surgical procedures were followed for different modalities like DHS, PFN, Enders Nail’s and cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty was done.
Results: Out of n=50 patients n=28(56%) were female and n=22(44%) were males. The average duration of hospital stay was 14 days, with a range of 10-25 days. The mean blood loss in cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty was 300 ml, PFN 100 ml, DHS was 250ml, and Ender’s Nail was 50ml. In our study of Bipolar hemiarthroplasty out of n=9 patients n=3 (33.34%) had excellent, n=5(55.56%) good outcome, n=1(11.12%) had fair outcomes respectively. Out of n=9 patients of PFN n=4 (44.44 %) of excellent, good n=4(44.44%), fair n=1 (11.12%) patient and no poor results. Out of n=25 patients of DHS n=20 (80%) patients are excellent to good results, n=3(12%) patient had fair and n=2 (8%) patients had poor results. Out of 7 patients of Ender’s nails n=2(28.573) had excellent and n=3(42.85%) had good and n=1(14.28%) fair, n=1(14.28) had poor results.
Conclusion: Intertrochanteric Fractures in the geriatric population are a unique challenge it requires early operative management which will reduce both mortality and morbidity. Early mobilization following operative treatment will reduce the risks associated with prolonged bed rest in geriatric patients. Since failure rate is still high in unstable intertrochanteric fractures selection of proper implants is important for the ultimate success of the treatment.

Keywords: Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures, Geriatric Population, Surgical Management

References

1. JD Zuckerman: Hip fracture. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:1519- 1523.
2. Jensen, J. S. Trochanteric Fractures. An Epidemiological, Clinical and Biomechanical Study. Acta Orthop Scandinavica, Supplementum 1981;188: 1-100.
3. Bergman, G. D. Winquist, R. A. Mayo, K. A. and Hansen, S. JR. Subtrochanteric Fracture of the Femur. Fixation Using the Zickel Nail. J. Bone and Joint Surg 1987; 69-A: 1032- 40.
4. Kova UKJ, Zuckerman LD. Hip fractures, evaluation, and treatment of intertrochanteric fracture. lAAOS. 1994;2:150-156
5. Bendo JA, Weiner LS, Strauss E, and Yang E: Collapse of intertrochanterichip fractures fixed with sliding screws. Orthop Rev Suppl 1994; 30-37.
6. Singh M, Nagrath AR, Maini PS. Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52(3):457–67.
7. Rosenfeld RT, Schwartz DR, Alter AH. Prosthetic replacements for trochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55:420.
8. Rodop O, Kiral A, Kaplan H, Akmaz I. Primary bipolar hemiprosthesis for unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop 2002;26:233–37.
9. Haentjens P, Lamaraski G. Endoprosthetic replacement of unstable, comminuted intertrochanteric fracture of the femur in the elderly, osteoporotic patient: a review Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27(18-19):1167-80.
10. Klinger HM, Baums MH, Eckert M, Neugebauer R. A comparative study of unstable per and intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with dynamic hip screw (DHS) and trochanteric butt-press plate vs proximal femoral nail (PFN). Zentralbl Chir 2005; 130(4):301-06.
11. Marcos Hideyo Sakaki, Alberto Tesconi Crocci, Arnaldo Valdir Zumiott. Comparative study of the locked intramedullary nail and ender pins in the treatment of tibial diaphyseal fractures. Clinics 2007;62(4):455-64.
12. Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Michelson O, Savolainen V, Hirvensalo E. Pertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with dynamic hip screws or a proximal femoral nail: A randomized study comparing post-operative rehabilitation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(1):76–81.

Cite this article

Ramreddy V ,Khan MI . A Study on the outcome of surgical management of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures in the geriatric population by various modalities. Perspectives in Medical Research 2020; 8(1): 43-47

Views
87
Downloads
15