Volume: 8 Issue: 2
Year: 2020, Page: 24-28, Doi: https://doi.org/10.47799/pimr.0802.08
Background: The main aim of hypospadias repair is to preserve the urethral plate whenever possible. This study was undertaken to compare the outcome of repair of severe hypospadias with moderate chordee by single-stage Snodgrass with two-stage repair with dermal graft corporoplasty.
Methods: This prospective cross-section study was done in the Department of Urology, Chalmida Anand Rao Institute of Medical Sciences, Bommakal, Karimnagar. The selection of the patients the type of surgery was based on the type of case. A total of n=31 patients were operated for severe hypospadias out of which n=14 single surgeries and n=17 two-staged surgeries were performed.
Results: N=25 patients were found with a moderate degree of chordee. No complications were found in n=11(78.57%) in single-stage repairs and two-stage repairs n=15(88.23%) were without complications the p values were found to be 0.012 which is significant. HOSE scores Erection correction was better in two staged surgeries as compared to single-stage repairs with p values <0.001 which is considered significant.
Conclusion: We can conclude that the repair of severe hypospadias with moderate chordee by two-staged repair showed better outcomes as compared to single-stage repair. The incidence of postoperative complications is also lesser with two-staged repairs. However, the choice of the procedure must be based on the type of hypospadias, choice of patients and economical constraints.
Keywords: Hypospadias, Single-stage repair, Two-stage repair
1. R. A. Sweet, H. G. Schrott, R. Kurland, and O. S. Culp. Study of the incidence of hypospadias in Rochester, Minnesota, 1940–1970, and a case-control comparison of possible etiologic factors. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 1974;49(1):52– 58.
2. Mouriquand PD, Persad R, Sharma S. Hypospadias repair: current principles and procedures. Br J Urol 1995; 76(Suppl 3):9–22.
3. Borer JG, Retik AB. Hypospadias. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, Editors. CampbellWalsh urology, ed. 9. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier 2007; 3703–44.
4. Baskin LS, Ebbers MB. Hypospadias: anatomy, etiology, and technique. J Pediatr Surg 2006;41:463–72.
5. Kalfa N, Philibert P, Sultan C. Is hypospadias a genetic, endocrine or environmental disease, or still an unexplained malformation? Int J Androl 2009;32:187–97.
6. Macnab AJ, Zouves C. Hypospadias after assisted reproduction incorporating in vitro fertilization and gamete intrafallopian transfer. Fertil Steril 1991;56:918– 22.
7. Silver RI, Rodriguez R, Chang TSK, Gearhart JP. In vitro fertilization is associated with an increased risk of hypospadias. J Urol 1999; 161:1954–57.
8. Tekgu¨ l S, Riedmiller H, Gerharz E, et al. Guidelines on pediatric urology. European Association of Urology Web site. http://www.uroweb.org/guidelines/onlineguidelines/. [Accessed on 15/01/2020]
9. Fichtner J, Filipas D, Mottrie AM, Voges GE, Hohenfellner R. Analysis of meatal location in 500 men: wide variation questions need for meatal advancement in all pediatric anterior hypospadias cases. J Urol 1995;154:833–34.
10. Uygur MC, Ersoy E, Erol D. Analysis of meatal location in 1,244 healthy men: definition of the normal site justifies the need for meatal advancement in pediatric anterior hypospadias cases. Pediatr Surg Int 1999;15:119–20.
11. Bracka A. A long-term view of hypospadias. Br J Plast Surg 1989; 42:251–55.
12. Bracka A. Sexuality after hypospadias repair. BJU Int 1999; 83(Suppl 3):29–33.
13. Bologna RA, Noah TA, Nasrallah PF, McMahon DR. Chordee: varied opinions and treatments as documented in a survey of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Section of Urology. Urology 1999; 53:608–12.
14. Cook A, Khoury AE, Neville C, Bagli DJ, Farhat WA, Pippi Salle JL. A multicenter evaluation of technical preferences for primary hypospadias repair. J Urol 2005; 174:2354– 57.
15. Snodgrass W. Changing concepts in hypospadias repair. Curr Opin Urol 1999;9:513–16.
16. Badawy H, Morsi H. Long-term follow-up of dermal grafts for repair of severe penile curvature. J Urol 2008; 180 (Suppl):1842–45.
17. Caesar RE, Caldamone AA. The use of free grafts for correcting penile chordee. J Urol 2000; 164:1691–93.
18. Gershbaum MD, Stock JA, Hanna MK, Baskin L, Hanna M, Khoury A. A case for the 2-stage repair of perineoscrotal hypospadias with severe chordee. J Urol 2002; 168:1727– 29.
19. Kogan SJ, Reda EF, Smey PL, Levitt SB. Dermal graft correction of extraordinary chordee. J Urol 1983; 130:952–54.
20. Lindgren BW, Reda EF, Levitt SB, Brock WA, Franco I. Single and multiple dermal grafts for the management of severe penile curvature. J Urol 1998; 160:1128–30.
21. Mohamed E. Hassan Two-stage versus single-stage repair for severe hypospadias with moderate chordee. Annals of Pediatric Surgery 2014; 10:125–29.
22. Holland AJA, Smith GHH, Cass DT. Clinical review of 'Snodgrass' hypospadias repair. Aust N Z J Surg 2000; 70:597-600.
23. Horowitz M, Salzhauer E. The learning curve in hypospadias surgery. BJU Int 2006; 97:593–96.
KSabbani Krishna Murthy . A comparative study of two-stage versus single-stage repair of severe Hypospadias . Perspectives in Medical Research 2020; 8 (2):24-28. DOI : 10.47799/pimr.0802.08