Perspectives in Medical Research

Volume: 11 Issue: 2

  • Open Access
  • Review Article

Artificial Intelligence and Computational Pathology: A comprehensive review of advancements and applications

1 Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Prathima Institute Medical Sciences, Nagunoor, Karimnagar, Telangana
2 Professor & HOD, Department of Pathology, Prathima Institute Medical Sciences, Nagunoor, Karimnagar, Telangana
*Corresponding Author: Prashant Kumar Madoori, Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Prathima Institute Medical Sciences, Nagunoor, Karimnagar, Telangana
E-MAIL: [email protected]

Year: 2023, Page: 29-35, Doi: https://doi.org/10.47799/pimr.1102.06

Received: June 21, 2023 Accepted: Aug. 12, 2023 Published: Aug. 12, 2023

Abstract

Conventional pathology is essential for disease diagnosis, but challenges like inter-observer variability can impact treatment decisions. Immunohistochemistry assays improve patient identification, but advanced quantitative tools are needed for accurate marker quantification and spatial analysis. AI enhances accuracy in pathology by contextualizing spatial data and revolutionizing medicine through advanced data processing and machine learning. Clinical informatics and AI integration advance patient care and open new horizons in pathology. Artificial intelligence (AI) is crucial in pathology, leveraging deep learning techniques to integrate pathological images with radiological, clinical, and genomic data. These pattern recognition methods enhance disease diagnosis and prognosis assessment. This review article provides an overview of AI in pathology, recent advancements, and future prospects. It emphasizes digital pathology, image acquisition, data preprocessing, and feature extraction for AI-driven pathology analysis. A comprehensive analysis of the key findings and outcomes from recent studies incorporating AI in pathology is done. A focus on various applications, including but not limited to cancer diagnosis, grading, and prognosis, as well as the identification of specific tissue patterns and rare diseases. The impact of AI on workflow optimization, quality assurance, and predictive analytics in pathology is also discussed. This section explores the implications and challenges of AI adoption in pathology. We discuss benefits like enhanced accuracy and resource allocation but also cover limitations such as dataset requirements, ethics, interpretability, and regulations. Ongoing research and collaborations aim to address these concerns and ensure responsible AI implementation in pathology.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence, Computation pathology, Global service model, Image analysis, Machine learning, Spatial contextualization

References

  1. Laurinavicius, A, Plancoulaine, B, Herlin, P & Laurinaviciene, A . 2016. Comprehensive Immunohistochemistry: Digital, Analytical and Integrated. Pathobiology 83(2-3):156–63.

  2. Tsao, M S, Kerr, K M, Kockx, M, Beasley, M B, Borczuk, A C & Botling, J . 2018. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry comparability study in real-life clinical samples: results of Blueprint phase 2 project. J Thorac Oncol 13(9):1302–1313.

  3. Matos, L L, Trufelli, D C, De Matos, M G & Da Silva Pinhal, M A . 2010. Immunohistochemistry as an important tool in biomarkers detection and clinical practice. Biomark Insights 5:9–20.

  4. Netto, G J, Eisenberger, M & Epstein, J I . 2011. TAX 3501 Trial Investigators. Interobserver variability in histologic evaluation of radical prostatectomy between central and local pathologists: findings of TAX 3501 multinational clinical trial. Urology 77(5):1155–60.

  5. Gown, A M . 2016. Diagnostic immunohistochemistry: what can go wrong and how to prevent it. Arch Pathol Lab Med 140(9):893–901.

  6. Brunnström, H, Johansson, A, Westbom-Fremer, S, Backman, M, Djureinovic, D & Patthey, A . 2017. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry in clinical diagnostics of lung cancer: inter-pathologist variability is higher than assay variability. Mod Pathol 30(10):28664936.

  7. Buisseret, L, Desmedt, C, Garaud, S, Fornili, M, Wang, X & Van Den Eyden, G . 2017. Reliability of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte and tertiary lymphoid structure assessment in human breast cancer. Mod Pathol 30(9):1204–1216.

  8. Borghaei, H, Paz-Ares, L, Horn, L, Spigel, D R, Steins, M & Ready, N E . 2015. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 373(17):26412456.

  9. Garon, E B, Rizvi, N A, Hui, R, Leighl, N, Balmanoukian, A S & Eder, J P . 2015. Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 372(21):2018–2046.

  10. Schmid, P, Adams, S, Rugo, H S, Schneeweiss, A, Barrios, C H & Iwata, H . 2018. Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 379(22):2108–2129.

  11. Rimm, D L, Han, G, Taube, J M, Yi, E S, Bridge, J A & Flieder, D B . 2017. A prospective, multi-institutional, pathologist-based assessment of four immunohistochemistry assays for PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer. JAMA Oncol 3(8):1051–1059.

  12. Lu, S, Stein, J E, Rimm, D L, Wang, D W, Bell, J M & Db, Johnson . 2019. Comparison of biomarker modalities for predicting response to PD-1/ PD-L1 checkpoint blockade: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 5(8):31318407.

  13. Cui, M & Zhang, D Y . 2021. Artificial intelligence and computational pathology. Lab Invest 101(4):412–434.

  14. Bejnordi, Ehteshami, Veta, B, M, Van Diest, Johannes, Van Ginneken, P, Karssemeijer, B, Litjens, N & G . 2017. Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer. JAMA 318(22):29234806.

  15. Liu, Y, Gadepalli, K, Norouzi, M, Dahl, G H, Kohlberger, T & Boyko, A . 2017. Detecting cancer metastases on gigapixel pathology images. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.02442

  16. Serag, A, Ion-Margineanu, A, Qureshi, H, Mcmillan, R, Saint Martin, M J & Diamond, J . 2019. Translational AI and deep learning in diagnostic pathology. Front Med 1:185.

  17. Hou, L, Samaras, D, Kurc, T M, Gao, Y, Davis, J E & Saltz, J H . 2016. Patch-based convolutional neural network for whole slide tissue image classification. Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit 2016:27795661.

  18. Chang, H Y, Jung, C K, Woo, J I, Lee, S, Cho, J & Kim, S W . 2019. Artificial intelligence in pathology. J Pathol Transl Med 53(1):30599506.

  19. Tizhoosh, H R & Pantanowitz, L . 2018. Artificial intelligence and digital pathology: challenges and opportunities. J Pathol Inform 14:38.

  20. Komura, D & Ishikawa, S . 2018. Machine learning methods for histopathological image analysis. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 16:34–42.

  21. Komura, D & Ishikawa, S . 2019. Machine learning approaches for pathologic diagnosis. Virchows Arch 475(2):131–139.

  22. Levine, A B, Schlosser, C, Grewal, J, Coope, R, Jones, Sjm & Yip, S . 2019. Rise of the machines: advances in deep learning for cancer diagnosis. Trends Cancer 5(3):157–69.

  23. Ching, Travers, Himmelstein, Daniel S, Beaulieu-Jones, Brett K, Kalinin, Alexandr A, Do, Brian T, Way, Gregory P, Ferrero, Enrico, Agapow, Paul-Michael, Zietz, Michael & Hoffman, Michael M . 2018. Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 15(141):20170387.

  24. Rashidi, H H, Tran, N K, Betts, E V, Howell, L P & Green, R . 2019. Artificial intelligence, and machine learning in pathology: the present landscape of supervised methods. Acad Pathol 6:2374289519873088.

  25. Krempel, R, Kulkarni, P, Yim, A, Lang, U, Habermann, B & Frommolt, P . 2018. Integrative analysis, and machine learning on cancer genomics data using the Cancer Systems Biology Database (CancerSysDB) BMC Bioinform 19(1):156.

  26. Cong, L, Feng, W, Yao, Z, Zhou, X & Xiao W . 2020. Deep learning model as a new trend in computer-aided diagnosis of tumor pathology for lung cancer. J Cancer 11(12):3615–3637.

  27. Louis, D N, Gerber, G K, Baron, J M, Bry, L, Dighe, A S & Getz, G . 2014. Computational pathology: an emerging definition. Arch Pathol Lab Med 138(9):1133–1141.

  28. Campanella, G, Hanna, M G, Geneslaw, L, Miraflor, A, Silva, Werneck Krauss, Busam, V & K J . 2019. Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images. Nat Med 25(8):1301–1310.

  29. Senaras, C, Niazi, Mkk, Lozanski, G & Gurcan, M N . 2018. DeepFocus: detection of out-of-focus regions in whole slide digital images using deep learning. PLOS ONE 13(10):205387.

  30. Janowczyk, A, Zuo, R, Gilmore, H, Feldman, M & Madabhushi, A . 2019. HistoQC: an open-source quality control tool for digital pathology slides. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 3(3):1–7.

  31. Kapil, A, Meier, A, Zuraw, A, Steele, K E, Rebelatto, M C & Schmidt, G . 2018. Deep semi supervised generative learning for automated tumor proportion scoring on NSCLC tissue needle biopsies. Sci Rep 8(1):17343.

  32. Barker, J, Hoogi, A, Depeursinge, A & Rubin, D L . 2016. Automated classification of brain tumor type in whole-slide digital pathology images using local representative tiles. Med Image Anal 30:60–71.

  33. Mazzanti, M, Shirka, E, Gjergo, H & Hasimi, E . 2018. Imaging, health record, and artificial intelligence: hype or hope? Curr Cardiol Rep 20(6):48.

  34. Smail-Tabbone, M & Rance, B . 2019. Contributions from the 2018 literature on bioinformatics and translational informatics 28:190–193.

  35. Landau, M S & Pantanowitz, L . 2019. Artificial intelligence in cytopathology: a review of the literature and overview of commercial landscape. J Am Soc Cytopathol 8(4):31272605.

  36. Houssami, N, Kirkpatrick-Jones, G, Noguchi, N & Lee, C I . 2019. Artificial Intelligence (AI) for the early detection of breast cancer: a scoping review to assess AI’s potential in breast screening practice. Expert Rev Med Devices 16(5):30999781.

  37. Jang, H J & Cho, K O . 2019. Applications of deep learning for the analysis of medical data. Arch Pharm Res 42(6):31140082.

  38. Korbar, B, Olofson, A M, Miraflor, A P, Nicka, C M, Suriawinata, M A & Torresani, L . 2017. Deep learning for classification of colorectal polyps on whole-slide images. J Pathol Inform 8:30.

  39. Wang, Dayong, Khosla, Aditya, Gargeya, Rishab, Irshad, Humayun & Beck, Andrew H . 2016. Deep learning for identifying metastatic breast cancer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05718 .

  40. Martin, V, Kim, T H, Kwon, M, Kuko, M, Pourhomayoun, M & Martin, S . 2018. A more comprehensive cervical cell classification using convolutional neural network. J Am Soc Cytopathol 7(5).

  41. Saltz, J, Gupta, R, Hou, L, Kurc, T, Singh, P & Nguyen, V . 2018. Spatial organization and molecular correlation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes using deep learning on pathology images. Cell Rep 23(1):181–193.

  42. Harmon, S A, Tuncer, S, Sanford, T, Choyke, P L & Türkbey, B . 2019. Artificial intelligence at the intersection of pathology and radiology in prostate cancer. Diagn Interv Radiol 25(3):31063138.

  43. Robertson, S, Azizpour, H, Smith, K & Hartman, J . 2018. Digital image analysis in breast pathology-from image processing techniques to artificial intelligence. Transl Res 194:19–35.

  44. Hamidinekoo, A, Denton, E, Rampun, A, Honnor, K & Zwiggelaar, R . 2018. Deep learning in mammography and breast histology, an overview and future trends. Med Image Anal 47:45–67.

  45. Mobadersany, P, Yousefi, S, Amgad, M, Gutman, D A, Barnholtz-Sloan, J S, Vega, Velázquez & J E . 2018. Predicting cancer outcomes from histology and genomics using convolutional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115(13):2970–2979.

  46. Aeffner, F, Zarella, M D, Buchbinder, N, Bui, M M, Goodman, M R & Hartman, D J . 2019. Introduction to digital image analysis in whole-slide imaging: a white paper from the digital pathology association. J Pathol Inform 10:9.

  47. Miller, D D & Brown, E W . 2018. Artificial intelligence in medical practice: the question to the answer? Am J Med 131(2):129–162.

  48. Farnell, D A, Huntsman, D & Bashashati, A . 2020. The coming 15 years in gynecological pathology: digitization, artificial intelligence, and new technologies. Histopathology 76(1):31846526.

  49. Granter, S R, Beck, A H, Papke, D J & Alphago, . 2017. Deep learning, and the future of the human microscopist. Arch Pathol Lab Med 141(5):619–640.

  50. Daren K Heyland, D K, Johnson, A P, Steven C Reynolds, S C & John Muscedere, J . 2011. Procalcitonin for reduced antibiotic exposure in the critical care setting: A systematic review and an economic evaluation. Critical. Care Medicine 39(7):1792–1799.

Cite this article

Madoori PK, Sannidhi S, Anandam G. Artificial Intelligence and Computational Pathology: A comprehensive review of advancements and applications. Perspectives in Medical Research. 2023;11(2):29-35 DOI: 10.47799/pimr.1102.06

Views
652
Downloads
293
Citations