Perspectives in Medical Research

Volume: 10 Issue: 3

  • Open Access
  • Original Article

Assessment and Applicability of Various Elements of Quality Assurance in Histopathology Laboratory: A Study from A Tertiary Care Hospital in Eastern Region of India

Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, ESI PGIMSR and ESIC Medical College, Joka, Kolkota, West Bengal, India
Professor, Department of Pathology. ESI PGIMSR, Manicktala, Kolkata
Department of Applied Statistics and Informatics., Indian Instiute of Technolgoy,Bombay, MUMBAI, Maharashtra
*Corresponding Author: Sudipta Chakrabarti, Professor, Department of Pathology. ESI PGIMSR, Manicktala, Kolkata
E-MAIL: [email protected]

Year: 2022, Page: 21-26, Doi: https://doi.org/10.47799/pimr.1003.05

Received: Nov. 16, 2020 Accepted: July 17, 2022 Published: July 17, 2022

Abstract

Background Quality control in histopathology is relatively newer concept and less understood because of its subjectivity.
Aim:The present study was conducted to assess and determine applicability of the different elements of quality assurance in the histopathology laboratory of a tertiary care hospital in eastern region of India.
Material and methods: An observational, retrospective and analytic study for one year and three months was conducted. 2000 samples were selected by simple random sampling including the biopsy specimens and cell blocks received in the histopathology laboratory.
Results:Of the 2000 samples, 1880 (94%) were accepted and 120 rejected (6%) due to mainly pre analytical factors. Of the rejected samples, 35 samples (29.2%) were without proper fixative, 48 samples (40%) had incomplete requisition forms, 37 samples (30.8%) had incomplete/ absent clinical history. Lack of adherence to standard tissue fixation protocols were observed in 55 cases (2.75%). Inadequate preventive maintenance and delay in renewal of maintenance contracts were the most common cause of failure of maintenance of equipment. Improper staining was found in 35 cases (1.75%). Grossing of specimens were inadequate in 104 cases (5.2%). Concurrence in diagnosis was found in majority cases (1892 cases, 94.6%). Random case review was done with adequate precision (97.5%) and accuracy (96.6 %). Maintenance of turnaround time was found in most cases (1800 cases, 90%).
Conclusion: Standard operating procedures, training of staffs, equipment maintenance, alertness to maintain turnaround time and awareness, proper report documentation and storage are the key factors to successfully uphold quality assurance.

Keywords: Histopathology, Laboratory, Quality assurance, Quality control

References

  1. Adyanthaya, S & Jose, M . 2013. Quality and safety aspects in histopathology laboratory. Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology: JOMFP 17(3):402–409.

  2. Davidson, D F . 2014. A survey of some pre-analytical errors identified from the BiochemistryDepartment of a Scottish hospital. Scot Med. J 59:91–94.

  3. Iyengar, J . 2009. Quality control in the histopathology laboratory: An overview with stress on the need for a structured national external quality assessment scheme. Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology 5(1):1–5.

  4. 2022. Cancer Protocol Templates. College of American Pathologists. https://www.cap.org/protocols-and-guidelines (accessed 2022-03-22)

  5. Sharif, M Q, Mushtaq, S, Mamoon, N, Jamal, S & Luqman, M . 2007. Clinician’s responsibility in pre-analytical quality assurance of histopathology. Pak J Med Sci 23:720–723.

  6. Nakhleh, R E . 2003. Lost, mislabeled and unsuitable surgical pathology specimens. Pathol Case Rev 8:98–102.

  7. D, Wolfe . 2019. Tissue processing. In: Suvarna SK, Layton C & Bancroft JD , eds. Bancroft’s Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques (8). (pp. 73-82) Philadelphia: Elsevier

  8. Wolfe, D . 2019. Suvarna SK, Layton C & Bancroft JD , eds. Bancroft’s Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. (pp. 73-83) Philadelphia: Elsevier

  9. Walter, C, Bell, Erik Scott, Young, Paul E, Billings, William E & Grizzle, . 2008. The Efficient Operation of The Surgical Pathology Gross Room. Biotech Histochem 83(2):71–82.

  10. Hocking, G R, Niteckis, V N, Cairns, B J & Hayman, J A . 1997. Departmental auditin surgical anatomical pathology. Pathology 29(4):418–439.

  11. Zarbo, R J, Gephardt, G N & Howanitz, P J . 1996. Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports: results of two College of American Pathologists Q-probes studies of biopsy and complex specimens. Arch Pathol Lab Med 120:234–278.

  12. Ribe, A, Ribalta, T, Lledo, R, Torras, G, Asenjo, M A & Cardesa, A . 1998. Evaluation of turnaround times as acomponent of quality assurance in surgical pathology. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 10(3):241–245.

  13. Hollensead, S C, Lockwood, W B & Elin, R J . 2004. Errors in pathology and laboratory medicine: consequences and prevention. J 88:161–81.

Cite this article

Mallick D, Chakrabarti S, Gayen P. Assessment and Applicability of Various Elements of Quality Assurance in Histopathology Laboratory: A Study from A Tertiary Care Hospital in Eastern Region of India. Perspectives in Medical Research. 2022;10(3):21-26 DOI: 10.47799/pimr.1003.05

Views
304
Downloads
145
Citations