Volume: 6 Issue: 3
Year: 2018, Page: 52-55,
Aims and objectives: To study the mode of presentation,risk factors and clinical presentation of fungal corneal ulcer,investigations regarding the type of fungus and the statistics regarding the common type of fungi that involve the cornea.
Materials and Methods :The materials for the study were drawn from corneal ulcer patients attending the Outpatient Department of Ophthalmology and 40 patients with fungal corneal ulcers were recruited for the study.
Results :Majority of patients were in the age group of working population from 21 -65 years. It was least in very young and old patients.Fungal ulcer was more common in males. Most of the patients were farmers (57%), followed by homemaker (15 %), others (13%) . The majority of patients 12 (30%) had trauma with vegetative matter.77.5 % were from rural areas whereas the rest of the 22.5 % were from urban areas.Fusarium was the commonest organism identified in 30% of patients followed by Aspergillusflavus(25%).
Conclusion :Microbiological work up goes a long way in facilitating specific therapy in fungal corneal ulcers. Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) mounts were in agreement with fungal culture in 62.5%of cases and so it can be used as a quick and reliable method to find out fungal etiology of corneal ulcers and treatment can be started immediately without waiting for the culture reports to arrive.
Keywords: Fungal corneal ulcer, KOH mount, Fungal culture
1. Guidelines for the Management of Corneal Ulcer at Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Care health facilities in the South- East Asia Region, World Health Organization Bulletin 2004; p6-8.
2. John P Whitcher, M. Srinivasan, Madan P. Upadhyay. Corneal blindness: aGlobal Perspective, Bulletin of World Health Organization, 2001; 79(3):p216-217
3. Robert C. Arff. Grayson’s Diseases of the Cornea, 4thedition, Mosby Publications, p257-269.
4. Srinivasan M, Gonzales CA, George C et al. Epidemiology and aetiological diagnosis of corneal ulceration in Madurai, South India. Br J Ophthalmol,1997;81: 965-971.
5. Chowdhary A, Singh K. Spectrum of Fungal Keratitis in North India. Cornea,2005; 24 (1): 8-15.
6. Bharathi MJ, Ramakrishnan R, Vasu S, Meenakshi R, PalaniappanR. Epidemiological characteristics and laboratory diagnosis of fungal keratitis. A three-year study. Indian J Ophthalmol 2003;51: 315-321
7. Basak S, Basak S, Mohante A, Bhowmick A. Epidemiological and microbiological diagnosis of suppurative keratitis in Gangetic West Bengal, Eastern Indian J Ophthalmol 2005; 53(1) :17-22.
8. Nath R, Baruah S, Saikia L, Devi B, Borthakur A. K, Mahanta J. Mycotic corneal ulcers in upper Assam. Indian J Ophthalmol 2011; 59(5): 367-371.
9. Sengupta S, Rajan S, Reddy R,Thiruvengadakrishnan K, Ravindran RD. Comparative study on the incidence and outcomes of pigmented versus non pigmented keratomycosis. Indian J Opthalmol 2011;4: 291-296.
10. Xuguang S, Zhixin W, Zhiqun W, Shiyun L, Ran L A. Ocular Fungal Isolates and Antifungal Susceptibility in Northern China. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143(1): 131-133.
11. Tanure M, Cohen E, Sudesh S, Rapuano C, Laibson P. Spectrum of Fungal Keratitis at Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Cornea 2000;19(3):307-312.
Ingle S,Lahari A,Krishna C P. Clinical study of Fungal corneal ulcer. Perspectives in Medical Research 2018; 6(3):52-55.