Perspectives in Medical Research

Volume: 5 Issue: 1

  • Open Access
  • Original Article

Comparative evolution of serological tests in the diagnosis of Syphilis

Sita Mahalakshmi B1, Sreedevi S2, Jyothi K3

1,2,3Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Kakatiya Medical College, Warangal,Telangana
Address for correspondence: Dr. B. Sita Mahalakshmi, Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Kakatiya Medical College, Warangal,Telanagana, India.
Email: [email protected]

Year: 2017, Page: 50-54,

Abstract

Background: Diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in syphilis show wide variation. The use of only one type of serologic test is insufficient for diagnosis.
Objective :The aim of the study was to review serologic data to determine diagnostic performance of three different methods of syphilis patients from MGM Hospital, Warangal in urban and rural areas during period of 2012-2013. 
Materials and Methods :In total, 144 RPR reactive samples were collected, with 1 in 4 or more titre of antibody by using RPR, TRUST and TPHA assays.
Results :144 test sera were collected from 3 sources namely ICTC, STD and Antenatal OP. 70 sera (48.6%) were taken from ICTC, 62 (43.5%) from STD and 12 (8.3%) from antenatal OP. Table compares the sensitivity and titres of antibody in RPR, TPHA and TRUST. Maximum number of samples (68) are reactive at (8) dilutions by RPR, 320 dilutions in TPHA and 64 dilutions in TRUST. The reactivity of all the samples by TPHA is 80 and above, and by TRUST, 32 and above.
Conclusion : Based on our results we think that specific Treponemal tests could contribute to reducing the errors that depend on specificity of the method used. Considering the methodology, rapid results and high sensitivity of RPR tests makes it a good choice as screening test in microbiology laboratories.

Keywords: Syphilis, Treponema pallidum, RPR and TPHA.

References

1. Peeling RW, Hook EW. The pathogenesis of syphilis: the great mimicker, revisited. J Pathol 2006;208:224-32.
2. Tsang RSW, Martin IE, Lau A, Sawatzky P. Serological diagnosis of syphilis: comparison of the Trep-Chek IgG enzyme immunoassay with other screening and confirmatory tests. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2007;51:118-24.
3. Sokolovskiy E, Frigo N, Rotanov S, Savicheva A, Dolia O, Kitajeva N, et al; EESRH Network. Guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis of syphilis in East European countries. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2009;23:623-32.
4. Wicher K, Horowitz HW, Wicher V. Laboratory methods of diagnosis of syphilis for the beginning of the third millennium. Microbes Infect 1999;1:1035-49.
5. M Kingston et al 2008. UK National Guidelines on the Management of Syphilis 2008.,International Journal of STD & AIDS 19., 2008; 729-740.
6. www.nhdiag.com/syphilis.shtml.
7. www.stdprevention training.org.
8. B West1, G Walraven1, L Morison2, J Brouwers1, R Bailey1. Performance of the rapid plasma reagin and the rapid syphilis screening tests in the diagnosis of syphilis in field conditions in rural Africa. Sex Transm Infect 2002;78:282- 285.
9. Tasbakan MI, Pullukçu H, Senol S, Yamazhan T, Kidak L, Gökengin D. Review of syphilis patient records in Izmir State Venereal Diseases Clinic from 1994 to 2004. Turk J Med Sci 2008;38:181-6.
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines 2010. http:// www.cdc.gov/std/treatment/2010/ STD-Treatment-2010- RR5912.pdf.
11. Sambri V, Lautenschlager S. Diagnosis of syphilis: clinical and laboratory problems. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2006;12:1058-72.
12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Syphilis testing algorithms using treponemal tests for initial screening – four laboratories, New York City, 2005-2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008;57:872-5.
13. Lesinski,J.,Nawara,A.,Hryniewicka,I.,Lyzwa, T., Kotysiska, J. (1977). Investigations on the specificity of the TPHA reaction in subject with suspected biologically false results of cardiolipintes' and its usefulness as a routine method of serological verification.Przeglqd Dermatologiczny,64,441-446.
14. Koneman, Allen, Janda, Paul C, Schreckenberger C. Winn Jr., 2000: Test Book of Diagnostic Microbiology 5th edition Pg No.956-960.
15. Thakar YS, Chande C, Mahalley AD, Saoji AM.Seroprevalence of syphilis by TPHA test.Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 1996;39(2):135-8.
16. Rajendran P1, Thyagarajan SP, Pramod NP, Joyee AG, Murugavel KG, Balakrishnan P, Hari R, Jeyaseelan L, Kurien T. Serodiagnosis of syphilis in a community: an evaluatory study.Indian J Med Microbiol. 2003 ;21(3):179-83.
17. M. M. D'Errico, M. Mariottini, S. Di Rosa, E. Prospero, M. Raffo, F. Carle. Syphilis and blood donors: Comparison of two different diagnostic strategies. European Journal of Epidemiology,1996; 12 (1)., 77-80.
18. Brown ST, Zaidi A, Larsen SA, Reynolds GH. Serological response to syphilis treatment. A new analysis of old data. JAMA 1985;253:1296-9.
19. Pettit, D E, Larsen, S.A. Harbee PS Feeky JC Pashem, CE, Cruce DD, Hambie, EA, and Perryman, MW, 1983. Toluidine red unheated serum test a non-treponemal test for syphilis . J. Clin. Microbiology 18: 1141-1145.

Cite this article

Sita Mahalakshmi B, Sreedevi S, Jyothi K. Comparative evaluation of serological tests in the diagnosis of Syphilis . Perspectives in medical research 2017;5(1):50-54.

Views
171
Downloads
241