Volume: 9 Issue: 3
Year: 2021, Page: 35-38, Doi: https://doi.org/10.47799/pimr.0903.09
Received: May 12, 2021 Accepted: Oct. 22, 2021 Published: Oct. 22, 2021
Background: Coronary artery disease is now becoming increasingly prevalent than before especially in younger age groups. We in the current study tried to evaluate the potential of 128 slice MDCT coronary angiography for the detection of stenotic coronary lesions by comparing the results of computed tomographic coronary angiography to a gold standard set by Conventional coronary angiography.
Methods: A total of n=30 patients with clinically suspected Coronary artery disease. They were evaluated with 128 Slice CT Scanner (PHILIPS INGENUITY) and conventional coronary angiography. All patients were examined with a 128 slice MDCT scanner (Philips Ingenuity 128 slice Netherlands) using standard cardiac CT protocol. Gantry rotation time was 400 ms with a half sector acquisition protocol and multisector reconstruction permiƫng an effective temporal resolution between 50 and 200 ms depending on patient heart rate.
Results: In the n=30 Patients included in the study with CCA, the n=450 coronary segments included in the study were found to contain a total number of n=138 stenoses among them non-significant stenoses. The accuracy of MDCT detection of coronary stenoses greater than 50% diameter of vessel lumen is about 94.78. When raising the threshold for stenosis from 50% to 70% of the vessel lumen, so that only hemodynamic relevant stenoses enter the evaluation, the sensitivity decreases from 88%. The MDCT detection in the patient group with heart rates below 60 beats per minute higher values for sensitivity 93% and specificity 97% were observed, compared to sensitivity 87% and specificity 93% of the patient group with heart rates above 60 beats per minute.
Conclusion:The present study revealed that a high negative predictive value (98.08%)suggests that 128- Slice MDCT coronary angiography is a good screening modality for evaluation of patients with mild to intermediate-risk factors who might otherwise require invasive angiography.
Keywords: Conventional coronary angiography, Coronary artery disease, MDCT coronary angiography
1. Gupta R, Gupta VP. Meta-analysis of coronary heart disease prevalence in India. Indian Heart J. 1996;48(3):241–286.
2. Cardiovascular diseases ; 2021,. Available from: http: //www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/en.
3. Levin DC. Invasive evaluation (coronary arteriography) of the coronary artery disease patient: clinical, economic, and social issues. Circulation. 1982;66(3):71–79.
4. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, Neill O, Goldstein WW, A J. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive Coronary Angiography Using 64-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:552–57.
5. Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C, Wintersperger BJ, Leber A, Johnson T. Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease. AJR. 2006;187:111–128.
6. Kim JS, Choo KS, Jeong DW, Chun KJ, Park YH, Song SG. Step and shoot prospectively ECG-gated vs. retrospectively ECG-gated withtube current modulation coronary CT angiography using 128-sliceMDCT patients with chest pain: diagnostic performance and radiation dose. Korean J Radiol. 2012;13(1):1–11.
7. Kopp AF, Schroeder S, Kuettner A, Baumbach A, Georg C, Kuzo R. Non-invasive coronary angiography with highresolution multidetector-row computed tomography. Results in 102 patients. Eur Heart J. 2002;23(21):1714– 1739.
8. Gorenoi V, Schönermark MP, Hagen A. CT coronary angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography in CHD. GMS Health Technol Assess. 2012;8.
9. Nieman K, Rensing BJ, Geuns RJV, Vos J, Pattynamapm, Krestingp. Non-invasive coronary angiography with multislice spiral computed tomography: impact of heart rate. Heart. 2002;88:470–74.
10. Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Becker C, Kopp AF, Schoepf UJ, Baum U. Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience. Radiology. 2000;217:564–71.
11. Bostrom K. Insights into the mechanism of vascular calcification. Am JCardiol. 2001;88:20–22.
12. Stary HC. The development of calcium deposits in atheroscleroticlesions and their persistence after lipid regression. AmJ Cardiol. 2001;88:16–19.
13. Burke AP, Weber DK, Kolodgie FD, Farb A, Taylor AJ, Virmani R. Pathophysiology of calcium deposition in coronary arteries. Herz. 2001;26:239–244.
Kumar S. Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance of MDCT Coronary Angiography in Comparison with Conventional Coronary Angiography. Perspectives in Medical Research. 2021;9(3):35-38 DOI: 10.47799/pimr.0903.09