Volume: 7 Issue: 1
Year: 2019, Page: 59-62,
Introduction: The incidence of cervical cancer has decreased due to wide spread use of Papanicolaou test (Pap) as a screening method to detect early cervical lesions. According to The Bethesda System 2001, atypical squamous cells are divided into two groups: Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US), atypical squamous cells cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H). As it is known, the microscopic interpretation of cytologic specimens is a subjective procedure highly dependent on skills and experience of the investigator. ASC reflects a diagnosis of uncertainty and is used as tool to measure interlaboratory and intralaboratory control for quality control purposes.
Aims and Objectives: To determine the inter observer variation in interpreting ASC variants in conventional pap smears based on the Bethesda system of reporting cervical cytology (2001).
Materials and Methods :A total of 833 cervical smears were sent for Pap test during the period July 2013 to –June 2014. Slides of all the cases of ASC and appropriate number of smears diagnosed as negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy were collected with relevant history. An observational study was performed with two evaluators blinded to the original reports. The review reports from the evaluators were compared with original reports to detect accuracy of reporting atypical squamous cells.
Results:Review of data showed 36 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), 8 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and 17 cases coded as atypical squamous cells (ASCUS and ASC-H). ASCUS/SIL ratio was 0.33. All the agreements were found out to be statistically significant and the agreement between original diagnosis and observer 1 was found out to be stronger compared to others.
Conclusion: Interobserver reproducibility in reporting cervical smears according to Bethesda system 2001 is not 100%, even after following strict Bethesda guidelines. Rescreening of smears is one of the best ways to improve quality control of the cytopathology laboratory.
Keywords: Pap smear, ASCUS, cervix
1. Solomon D, NayarR. TheBetheda system for reporting cervical cytology.2nd ed:USA.Springer;2004.
2. CibasES, DucatmanBS. Cytology .Diagnostic principles and clinical correlates.3rded: China.Elsevier;2009.
3. Klinkhamer PJ, Voojis GP, De Haan AF. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the diagnosis of epithelial cell abnormalities in cervical smears. Acta Cytol 1988:32:794- 800.
4. Gupta DK, Komaromy Hiller G, Raab SS, Nath ME.Interobserver variability in the cytological diagnosis of normal and abnormal metaplastic squamous cells in pap smears. Acta Cytol 2001:45(: 697-703.
5. Tobias AHG, Amaral RG, DinizEM. Quality indicators of cervical cytopathology tests in the public service in Minas Gerais, Brizil. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2016:38:65-70.
6. La Ruche G, Mensah Ado I, Dabis F. Cervical screening in Africa: discordant diagnosis in a double dependent reading. DYSCER-C1 Group. J Clin Epidermiol 1999:52:953-8.
7. Koss LG, Melamed MR, Koss diagnostic cytology and its histopathologic cases, Lippincott Williams and Wikins, 5 Edition, USA, 2006, 1184-240.
8. Chhieng DC, Talley LI, Roberson J, Gatscha RM, Jhala NC. Interobserver variability- comparison between liquidbased and conventional preparations in gynecological cytology. Cancer cytopathol 2002:96:67-73.
9. Gatscha RM, Abadi M, Babore S, Chhieng D, Miller MJ,Saigo PE. Smears diagnosed as ASCUS: interobserver variation and follow-up. DiagnCytopathol 2001;25:138- 140.
10. JuskeviciusR,ZouKH;An Analysis of factors that influence the ASCUS/SIL Ratio of Pathologists- Am J Clin Pathol 2001;116:331-35.
11. Goksedef B P C, Akbayir O, Baran SY et al. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in postmenopausal women: a comparative retrospective analysis- EJOGRB 2011;159:418-21.
12. Bigras G, Wilson J, Russell L, JohnsonG, Morel D. Interobserver concordance in the assessment of features used for diagnosis of cervical atypical squamous cells and squamous intraepithelial lesions(ASC-US, ASC-H, LSIL and HSIL). Cytopathol 2013:24:44-51.
13. Koss LG. The Papinicolaou test for cervical cancer detection, A triumph and a tragedy of cervical atypical squamous cells and squamous intraepithelial lesions (ASC-US, ASC-H, LSIL and HSIL).JAMA 1989; 261:737-43.
14. Mc Grath C M, ASCUS in Papanicolaou smears problems, controversies and potential future directions. Am J clin pathol 2002;3:117-9.
Deepthi V S, Ramaswamy A S, Prashant BM. Inter observer variability in the interpretation of Atypical Squamous cells in Pap smear examination. Perspectives in Medical Research 2019; 7(1):59-62.