Perspectives in Medical Research

Volume: 10 Issue: 3

  • Open Access
  • Original Article

Study of magnitude of grand multiparty and its perinatal outcome in a tertiary hospital of rural area in Maharashtra

1 Associate Professor, Department of OBGY, JIIU's IIMSR, Badnapur, Jalna, Maharashtra
2 HOD & Professor, Department of OBGY, JIIU's IIMSR, Badnapur, Jalna, Maharashtra
3 Senior Resident, Department of OBGY, JIIU’s IIMSR, Badnapur, Jalna, Maharashtra
*Corresponding Author: Amreen kausar Khan, Senior Resident, Department of OBGY, JIIU’s IIMSR, Warudi, Badnapur, Jalna, Maharashtra
E-MAIL: [email protected]

Year: 2022, Page: 83-86, Doi: https://doi.org/10.47799/pimr.1003.15

Received: March 24, 2022 Accepted: Aug. 10, 2022 Published: Aug. 10, 2022

Abstract

Background: Grand multiparous pregnancies have been considered to be at higher risk of developing antenatal and perinatal complications like pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, anemia, antepartum hemorrhages, preterm labor, mal-presentation, mal-position and feto-pelvic disproportion This study was done to know the magnitude of grand multipara attending the tertiary care center with possible complications related to high parity.
Objectives:To study the prevalence possible feto-maternal complications associated with grand multipara at rural setup. 
Methodology:Descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in medical college of rural area for 12 months. Grand multipara with 5 or more deliveries before current pregnancy coming for antenatal checkup and delivery were enrolled. Antenatal history was recorded till delivery and feto-maternal outcomes were noted.
Results:Out of 1500 deliveries conducted during study period, 110 (7.5%) cases were grand multipara. Majority of them (79.5%) were Muslim and 80% were anaemic. 60% delivered with FTND, and 25.4% had emergency LSCS with one intrauterine death and a single breach delivery. Predominantly preeclampsia (23.6%) and malpresentation (14.5%) were diagnosed as antepartum complications. Almost one fifth of them had postpartum hemorrhage which was controlled with no mortality. 13 (11.8%) grand multipara women had still birth or early neonatal death, though fetal distress was observed in 37 cases. 
Conclusion: Grand multiparty is still a high-risk pregnancy associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in our facility with multiple interrelated but mostly preventable causes.

Keywords: Grand multipara, Preeclamsia, PPH, Fetal distress, Antepartum hemorrhage

References

  1. Shaista, T A, Shazia, S, Fouzia, B S & Rafia, B . 2009. Obstetrical Complication in Grand Multi Parity. Medical Channel 12:53–58.

  2. Okogbenin, S A & Okpere, E E . 2004. Okpere, E.E. & Ed. , eds. Clinical Obstetrics Revised Edition. (pp. 401-441) Nigeria: Uniben Press Ltd

  3. 2004. National Survey of Family Growth center for disease control and prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention .

  4. Eze, J N, Okaro, J M & Okafor, M H . 2006. Outcome of Pregnancy in the Grandmultipara in Enugu. Nigeria. Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 23:8–11.

  5. Ogbe, A E, Ogbe, B P & Ekwempu, C . 2010. Obstetric Outcome in Grand-Multiparous Women in Jos University Teaching Hospital. Jos Journal of Medicine 6:1–5.

  6. Begum, S . 2003. Age and Parity Related Problems Affecting Outcome of Labour in Grand Multipara. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 42:179–183.

  7. Mor-Yosef, S, Seidman, D S, Samueloff, A & Schenker, J G . 1990. The Effects of the Socioeconomic Status on the Perinatal Outcome of Grandmultipara. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 36:117–123.

  8. Nordin, N M, Fen, C K, Isa, S & Symonds, E M . 2006. Is Grandmultiparity a Significant Risk Factor in This New Millennium? Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences 13:52–60.

  9. Shah, P S . 2010. Parity and Low Birth Weight and Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 89:862–875.

  10. Chukwudebelu, W O . 2003. Okonofua, F. and Odunsi & K. , eds. Contemporary Obstetrics and Gynaecology for Developing Countries. Women’s Health and Action Research Centre (WHARC). (pp. 644-657) Benin:

  11. Eidelmanai, Kamarr, Schimmelms, & Bar-One, . 1988. The grand multipara: is she still a risk? American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 158:389–92.

  12. Aziz-Karims, & Memonam, Qadrin . 1989. Grand multiparity: a continuing problem in developing countries. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol 15:155–60.

  13. Souza, D’, Monteiro, K, Jayaprakash, F N, Bhagavath, K, Krishnan, P & S . 2012. Spectrum of grand multiparity. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 5(6):1247–50.

  14. Roy, R & Vernekar, M . 2017. Feto-maternal outcome in grand multipara. International Journal of Reproduction 6(7):2846–52.

  15. Shahida, S M, Islam, M A, Begum, S, Hossain, M A & Azam, M S . 2011. Maternal outcome of grand multipara. Mymensingh Medical Journal: MMJ 20(3):381–386.

  16. Bezirciolu, Incim & Göral, Nilgün Yapan . 2013. The effect of grand multiparity on maternal, obstetric, fetal and neonatal outcomes. Perinatal Journal 21(1):17–22.

  17. Emanuel, M & Butt, S . 2015. Frequency and factors leading to recurrent pre-eclampsia. J Pak Med Assoc 65(11):1173–1180.

  18. Babinszki, A, Kerenyi, T, Torok, O, Grazi, V, Lapinski, R H & Berkowitz, R L . 1999. Perinatal outcome in grand and great-grand multiparity: effects of parity on obstetric risk factors. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 181:669–74.

  19. Singh, S P, Chawan, J & Mangla, D . 2015. A descriptive study: maternal and fetal outcome of grand multipara. Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology 4(1):219–243.

  20. Shechter, Y, Levy, A, Wiznitzer, A, Zlotnik, A & Sheiner, E . 2010. Obstetric complications in grand and great grand multiparous women. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 23(10):1211–1218.

Cite this article

IF, Nagapurkar S, Khan Ak. Study of magnitude of grand multiparty and its perinatal outcome in a tertiary hospital of rural area in Maharashtra. Perspectives in Medical Research. 2022;10(3):83-86 DOI: 10.47799/pimr.1003.15

Views
248
Downloads
172
Citations