Perspectives in Medical Research

Volume: 12 Issue: 2

  • Open Access
  • Original Article

A Comparative Study of Mandibular Ramus Dimensions between Males and Females in Cadavers from Maharashtra

Shamama Farheen Shaikh1∗ , Sana Khan2 , Gautam Shroff3 , Vaishali Mandhana4 , Pawan Sonawane5

1Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, MGM Medical College, Sambhajinagar (Aurangabad), Maharashtra
2Assistant Lecturer, Department of Anatomy, MGM Medical College, Sambhajinagar (Aurangabad), Maharashtra
3Professor and HOD, Department of Anatomy, MGM Medical College, Sambhajinagar (Aurangabad), Maharashtra
4Professor, Department of Anatomy, MGM Medical College, Sambhajinagar (Aurangabad), Maharashtra
5Assistant Lecturer, Department of Anatomy, MGM Medical College, Sambhajinagar (Aurangabad), Maharashtra

*Corresponding Author: Shamama Farheen Shaikh, Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, MGM Medical College, Sambhajinagar (Aurangabad), Maharashtra E-MAIL: [email protected]

Year: 2024, Page: 56-60, Doi: https://doi.org/10.47799/pimr.1202.11

Received: Feb. 27, 2024 Accepted: March 30, 2024 Published: Aug. 12, 2024

Abstract

Background: The mandible, being a robust bone, remains intact postmortem and can be utilized for gender determination. Morphometric analysis of the mandibular ramus holds significance for anthropologists, anatomists, and prosthetists. This study aims to assess the height and breadth of the mandibular ramus and their association with gender. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 56 cadaveric mandibles (18 female and 38 male). The height and breadth of the mandibular ramus were measured.Results: The mean ± SD for ramus height and breadth on the right side for females was 41.18 ± 4.70 mm and 28.89 ± 2.28 mm, respectively, while on the left side, it was 43.03 ± 3.57 mm and 30.70 ± 7.62 mm, respectively. For males, the mean ± SD for ramus height and breadth on the right side was 47.34 ± 2.88 mm and 33.14 ± 3.26 mm, respectively, while on the left side, it was 47.39 ± 3.88 mm and 32.39 ± 3.85 mm, respectively. Conclusion: The mean ± SD for ramus height and breadth was greater in males than in females. Although this study was conducted on cadaveric mandibles, the mandibular ramus can be utilized for gender determination in medico-legal and forensic cases.Keywords: gender, mandible, morphometry, mandibular ramus

Keywords: gender, mandible, morphometry, mandibular ramus

References

  1. Kranioti, E F, García-Donas, J G & Langstaff, H . 2014. Sex estimation of the Greek mandible with the aid of discriminant function analysis and posterior probabilities. Rom J Legal Med 22:101–105.

  2. Reddy, KSN & Murthy, O P . 2014. Identification. In: The Essentials of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology (33). (pp. 65-70) New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers

  3. Mathew, N S, Chatra, L, Shenoy, P, Veena, K M, Prabhu, R V & Sujatha, B K . 2017. Gender determination in panoramic radiographs, utilizing mandibular ramus parameters: A cross-sectional study. J Dent Res Rev 4:32–35.

  4. Aitchison, J . 1963. Sex Differences in Teeth, Jaws, and Skulls 15:52–57.

  5. Ongkana, N & Sudwan, P . 2010. Morphologic Indicators of Sex in Thai Mandibles. Chiang Mai Medical Journal 49:123–128.

  6. Shamout, A R, Ammoush, M, Alrbata, R & Habahbah, A A . 2012. Age and Gender Differences in Gonial Angle, Ramus Height and Bigonial Width in Dentate Subjects. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal 32:81–87.

  7. Baydaş, B, Yavuz, I, Dağsuyu, I M, Bölükbaşi, B & Ceylan, I . 2004. An Investigation of Maxillary and Mandibular Morphology in Different Overjet Groups. Australian Orthodontic Journal 20:11–18.

  8. Indira, AP, Markande, A & David, MP . 2012. Mandibular ramus: An indicator for sex determination - A digital radiographic study. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences 4(2):58–62.

  9. Vodanović, M, Dumančić, J, Demo, Ž & Mihelić, D . 2006. Determination of sex by discriminant functional analysis of mandible from two Croatian archaeological sites. Acta Stomatol Croat 40:263–77.

  10. Shivaprakash, S & Ashok, KR . 2018. Study of Mandibular Ramus as Predictor of Sex. International Journal of Anatomy and Research 6(4.2):5869–5872.

  11. Mbajiorgu, E F, Zivanovich, S, Asala, S A & Mavera, G A . 1996. A pilot study of mandibular angle in black Zimbabweans. Cent Afr J Med 42(10):285–292.

  12. Ongkana, Nutcharian & Sudwan, Paiwan . 2009. Gender differences in Thai mandibles using metric analysis. Chiang Mai Med J 48(2):43–51.

  13. Karmarkar, P, Mhapuskar, A, Hiremutt, Prasad & D R . 2023. Mandibular Ramus: An Indicator for Gender Determination. Cureus 15(1).

  14. Damera, Anitha, Mohanalakshmi, J, Yellarthi, Prathima Kumari & Rezwana, BM . 2016. Radiographic evaluation of mandibular ramus for gender estimation: Retrospective study. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences 8:74–78.

  15. Nagaraj, Tejavathi, James, Leena, Gogula, Sita, Ghouse, Noori, Nigam, Haritma & Sumana, C K . 2017. Sex determination by using mandibular ramus: A digital radiographic study. Pathology and Surgery 4:5–8.

  16. Sharma, M, Gorea, R.K., Gorea, Arshdeep & Abuderman, Abdulwahab . 2016. A morphometric study of the human mandible in the Indian population for sex determination. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences 6(2):165–169.

Cite this article

Shaikh SF, Khan S, Shroff G, Mandhana V, Sonawane P. A Comparative Study of Mandibular Ramus Dimensions between Males and Females in Cadavers from Maharashtra. PerspecƟves in Medical Research. 2024;12(2):56-60 DOI: 10.47799/pimr.1202.11

Views
278
Downloads
333
Citations