Volume: 8 Issue: 1
Year: 2020, Page: 18-23,
Background: Many imaging modalities have been in use for the evaluation of temporal bone lesions. Plain X-rays are cost-effective however; they provide limited details and hence sometimes may result in an inaccurate diagnosis. With the advent of HRCT, the method of imaging of temporal bone has evolved with special algorithms and multiplanar formats. In the present study, we tried to evaluate the different pathologies of the temporal bone with X-ray and HRCT.
Methods: The study was conducted in the Departments of Otorhinolaryngology and Radiology, Prathima Institute of Medical Sciences, Naganoor, Karimnagar. A total of n=40 patients were identified and selected based on their symptoms and clinical findings suggestive of a lesion involving the temporal bone such as Otalgia, Otorrhoea, And Sensorineuronal deafness, pulsatile tinnitus, vertigo, and giddiness. These patients were subjected to high resolution computed tomography of the temporal bone on the 128 Slice CT Scanner (PHILIPS INGENUITY). The patients also underwent plain Radiography of temporal bone (CARESTREAM DRX-1 System).
Results: Of the total n=40 patients studied the most common temporal bone disease was due to inflammation 85% and tumors were found in 15% of the patients. The common site of involvement of middle ear and mastoid air cells in chronic otitis media was epitympanum in n=30(90%) of cases, Mesotympanum in n=20(60%) of cases. In diseased ears, radiographs of the mastoids revealed pneumatised mastoid in 6(15%), diploic in 6(15%), and sclerosed mastoid in 28(70%) cases. HRCT temporal bone revealed pneumatised mastoid in 9(22.5%), diploic in 5(12.5%) and sclerosed mastoid in 26(65%) cases.
Conclusion: The role of plain radiography is found to be limited to know the type of mastoid pneumatisation. It can also as Original Article detect bony erosion in few cases. Because of the ability to see temporal bone structures with great clarity, HRCT can be recommended not only in cases suspected with potential complications but also in all cases of temporal bone pathologies to know the extent of disease, inter-relationships of the tympanomastoid compartment with adjacent neurovascular structures, varied pneumatisation and the presence of anatomical variations, which should alert the clinician and guide in surgical approach and treatment plan.
Keywords: High Resolution Computed Tomography, Conventional Radiography, Temporal bone pathologies.
1. Chakeres DW, Augustyn MA. Temporal bone. In: Haaga JR., Lanzieri CF, Gilkeson RC. CT and MR Imaging of the Whole Body .4thed. Ohio, Mosby, 2003: 495-512.
2. Virapongse C, Rothman SLG, Kier EL, Sarwar M. computed tomographic anatomy of the temporal bone. AJR 1982; 139:739-749.
3. Chandra S, Goyal M, Gandhi D, Gera S, Berry M. Anatomy of facial nerve in the temporal bone: HRCT. Indian J Radiol Imaging 1999;9:5-8.
4. Lloyd G, du Boulay G, Phelps P, Pullicino P. The demonstration of the auditory ossicles by high-resolution CT. Neuroradiology. 1979; 18(5):243-248.
5. Paparella MM, Kim CS. Mastoidectomy update. Laryngoscope. 1977; 87(12):1977-88.
6. Vlastarakos P, Kiprouli C, Pappas S, Xenelis J, Maragoudakis P, Troupis G et al. CT scan versus surgery: how reliable is the preoperative radiological assessment in patients with chronic otitis media? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;269(1):81-86.
7. Sunita M, A.P. Sambandan. Importance of pre-operative HRCT temporal bone in chronic suppurative otitis media.Odisha Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2015;9(1):10-13.
8. Gomaa M, Abdel Karim A, Abdel Ghany H, Elhiny A, Sadek A. Evaluation of Temporal Bone Cholesteatoma and the Correlation Between High Resolution Computed Tomography and Surgical Finding. Clinical Medicine Insights: Ear, Nose, and Throat. 2013;(6)21-28.
9. Sirigiri RR, Dwaraknath K. Correlative Study of HRCT in Attico-Antral Disease. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 ; 63(2):155- 58.
10. Banerjee A, Flood L, Yates P, Clifford K. Computed tomography in suppurative ear disease: does it influence management. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 2003; 117:454-458.
11. Keskin S, Cetin H, Tore H. The Correlation of Temporal Bone CT With SurgeryFindings in Evaluation of Chronic Inflammatory Diseases of the Middle Ear. Europian Journal of General Medicine. 2011; 8(1):24-30.
12. Swartz J. Cholesteatomas of the middle ear. Diagnosis, etiology, and complications. Radiologic Clinics of North America. 1984; 22(1):15-35.
13. Mohammadi G, Naderpour M, Mousaviagdas M. Ossicular erosion in patients requiring surgery for cholesteatoma. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 24(68):125 28.
14. Jackler RK. Schindler RA. Role of the mastoid in tympanic membrane reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 1984 Jun; 94:495-500.
15. Karim A, Khan H, Gomma M, El-Hene A, Sadek A. Radiological Evaluation of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma. ElMinia Medical Bulletin. 2010; 21(1):67-74.
16. Kennedy.GRS, Jagadish. A Study of the Incidence of Cerebellopontine Angle Tumors and their Management in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Journal of Evidence-based Medicine and Healthcare.2015; 2(17): 2517-24.
17. Denia A, Perez F, Canalis RR, Graham MD. Extracanalicular osteomas of the temporal bone. Arch Otolaryngol 1979; 105(12):706-09.
18. Hurtado-García JF, López Rico JJ, Ballester Moll F, Aracil Montesinos A, Talavera Sánchez J. Extracanalicular osteomas of the temporal bone: three cases. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 1994;45(3):177-80.
19. Holmquist J. Aeration in chronic otitis media. Clin Otolaryngol 1978; 3(3): 279-284.
20. Sethi A, Singh I, Agarwal AK, Sareen D. Pneumatization of mastoid air cells: Role of acquired factors. Int J Morphol 2006; 24: 35-38.
P Ramravi Kumar. A Hospital based study of High Resolution Computed Tomography and Conventional Radiography for Evaluation of Pathologies of Temporal Bone. Perspectives in Medical Research 2020; 8(1):18-23